Publications
2025
- Multi-sectoral interactions in energy transition: Unveiling tensions between sustainability and justiceLaura Kainiemi, Minttu Laukkanen, Jarkko Levänendoi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125437
- Abstract
The energy transition is crucial for mitigating climate change, but it also poses challenges and can create injustices within the energy sector and beyond, particularly in industries such as lithium-ion batteries and the extraction of battery raw materials. These impacts create tensions between achieving a sustainable energy transition and addressing the injustices that arise from its negative consequences. To ensure a just transition, it is crucial to balance these tensions. This article investigates the multi-sectoral interactions between the energy transition and critical raw materials by focusing on the global lithium-ion battery value chain. By integrating concepts from just transitions with the notion of tensions from corporate sustainability literature, we explore tensions between justice and sustainability that arise from interactions between sectors. The most severe impacts are prevalent in the Global South, where most of the battery raw material deposits are located, while battery consumption is predominantly in the Global North. Five key types of tensions between justice and sustainability are identified. Tensions related to distributive justice are particularly prominent in the Global South, whereas issues concerning participatory processes and indigenous rights are more prevalent in the Global North. Identifying these tensions is crucial for facilitating a just transition by effectively managing the conflicts between justice and sustainability.
- Abstract
- Stakeholder Perspectives on EU Regulatory Frameworks: Navigating Critical Raw Materials, Battery Innovation, and Recycling ChallengesAnish Patil, Willem Arie Wonkdoi: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19634.1
- Abstract
The European Union’s Green Deal Industrial Plan (GDIP) is designed to make Europe more sustainable, energy-independent, and carbon-neutral by 2050. It includes policies like the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA) and the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) to boost clean technology production—such as electric vehicles—and secure essential raw materials like lithium and cobalt. The EU Battery Regulation 2023 also sets strict rules to make battery production and recycling more sustainable. However, despite these efforts, complex regulations and overlapping policies create challenges for businesses and investors.
This study looks at how well these policies work together and what stakeholders—such as industry leaders and policymakers—think about them. The research finds that while the EU’s green policies aim for the same goals, they sometimes conflict or create unnecessary barriers. Many stakeholders are concerned about unclear regulations and the feasibility of certain targets. A key challenge is the lack of skilled workers in green industries, which could slow down the transition.
To make the Green Deal a success, the EU needs clearer and more coordinated policies, better communication with stakeholders, and a stronger focus on workforce training. Encouraging careers in green technology and using tools like the European battery passport can help make the transition smoother and more effective.
- Abstract
- Organic and Ionic Liquids Electrolyte Solutions as Versatile Media for Metallic Lithium RecoveryMihai Tudor Olaru, Alexandru Matei, Irina Atkinson, Adelina Ionela Matei, Elena Bacalum, Miruna Iota and Ana-Maria PopescuMaterialsdoi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122899
- Abstract
For various applications, particularly in battery technology, there is a significant demand for uniform, high-quality lithium or lithium-coated materials. The use of electrodeposition techniques to obtain such materials has not proven practical or economical due to the low solubility of most lithium salts in suitable solvents. In this study, we propose efficient lithium electrodeposition processes and baths that can be operated at low temperatures and relatively low costs. We utilized organic solvents such as dimethyl acetamide (DMA), dimethylforamide (DMF), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), as well as a mixture of DMSO and ionic liquid [1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide BMIMTFSI]. Lithium salts such as LiCl, Li2CO3, and LiNO3 were tested. Lithium metal was deposited on copper substrates at different temperatures and selected current densities within an argon-filled glovebox using a DC power source or a PARSTAT-4000A potentiostat. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was employed to determine and compare the deposition processes. The obtained deposits were analyzed through visual inspection (photography) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Chemical analysis (ICP-OES) and XRD confirmed the presence of lithium and occasionally lithium hydroxide in the deposits. The best results were achieved with the deposition of lithium from DMSO-LiNO3 and DMSO-BMIMTFSI-LiNO3 systems.
- Abstract
- Electrodialytic Lithium Extraction from Secondary Resources: Technical, Environmental and Economic AssessmentJoana Almeida, Joana R. Gouveia, Inês S. Ribeiro, Carolina M. Pires, Eduardo Mateus, Alexandra B. RibeiroSustainable Chemistry and Pharmacydoi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2025.102189
- Abstract
In transportation, large-scale electrification, particularly through lithium-ion batteries, is expected to drive significant emissions reductions while simultaneously increasing global lithium demand. However, the limited availability of lithium, compounded by geopolitical constraints, poses risks to the energy transition, namely in the European Union. Adopting circular economy models offers a sustainable approach to increase resource recovery. The present research aims to assess the potential of the electrodialytic process for lithium recovery from wastewater generated during lithium-ion battery recycling and aluminium-lithium alloy dust processing, as well as related environmental and economic impacts. Bench-scale experiments were conducted using two-compartment electrodialytic reactors, operated at 50 mA, 100 mA and 200 mA with a cation-exchange membrane interposed. Tests were performed over 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Lithium recovery reached 91.54 % from the aluminium-lithium alloy dust and 97.23 % from the wastewater of lithium-ion battery recycling. The cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment resulted in 0.26 kg of CO2 eq/g Li global warming impacts for wastewater of lithium-ion battery recycling, and 46.40 kg of CO2 eq/g Li for aluminium-lithium alloy dust. Material flow cost accounting showed lower recovery costs for wastewater (0.36 €/g Li versus 129.26 €/g Li). Energy consumption in the reactor is the primary hotspot, where optimizing energy and time efficiency could reduce environmental and economic impacts.
- Abstract
2024
- The Energy Storage Technology Revolution to Achieve Climate NeutralityBadea I-C, Șerban B-A, Anasiei I, Mitrică D, Olaru MT, Rabin A & Ciurdaș Mdoi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17010140
- Abstract
The intensive exploitation and usage of fossil fuels has led to serious environmental consequences, including soil, water, and air pollution and climate changes, and it has compromised the natural resources available for future generations. In this context, identifying new energy storage technologies can be considered a sustainable solution to these problems, with potential long-term effects. In this work, were analyzed different alternatives that can be suitable for replacing non-renewable sources, where hydrogen, wave, wind, or solar energies were considered. Although they have numerous advantages in terms of usage and substantially reducing the environmental impact, this paper is focused on lithium-ion batteries, whose high performance and safety during operation have made them attractive for a wide range of applications. The study of potential replacement technologies and the technical requirements for the main materials used is the starting point in reducing the environmental footprint, without affecting the technical capabilities, followed by the transition toward economic circularity and climate neutrality.
- Abstract
- Assessment of the effect of acids application during the electrodialytic recovery of lithium from mine tailingsJoana Almeida, Carolina Pires, Catarina Branco, Eduardo P. Mateus, Alexandra.B. Ribeirodoi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.145495
- Abstract
Energy transition has been driven by climate change and the need to decarbonize the transport sector. Herein, lithium-ion batteries play a prominent role in transports electrification and renewable energy sources integration, which has been increasing lithium demand worldwide. To alleviate lithium primary resources exploitation, the use of secondary resources of lithium are desirable, considering a circular perspective. Mine tailings are generated in massive volumes, due to low ore grades, and may present contents of lithium-based minerals. Therefore, proper management is required to guarantee the safety of this resource, offering also an opportunity for secondary recovery of critical raw materials, such as lithium. The present work aimed to analyse the potential of the electrodialytic process to recover lithium from mine tailings with lepidolite contents. The addition of inorganic and organic acids was tested, to address the synergy between the electrodialytic process and acids extraction. Pre-heat of the solid suspension and of the solid sample was also considered. Bench scale experiments were conducted considering a two-compartment electrodialytic reactor at 100 mA, with a cation exchange membrane interposed. Eight different acids, at concentrations of 0.1 mol/L and 0.5 mol/L, were tested individually and in mixture, during 3, 4 and 10 days. The highest lithium recovery ratio (29.8%) was obtained for the experiment conducted with oxalic acid at 0.5 mol/L and suspension pre-heated (55 °C) for 24 h These conditions improved chemical reactivity and the dissolution of lithium minerals.
- Abstract